So i get the faster the better but what is the CL part and does it make much difference ? 3200 CL14 has a 14% better performance index, so I would go with that. cl14와 cl16의 차이가 어떤게 있을까 지스킬 트라이던트z 로얄 3200 cl16 실버 테스트기,얼마전 필자는 지스킬 트라이던트z 로얄 32 I havent tried to oc or tweak ram before, so I dont really know what is required.As for tweaking the RAM like that I would look up some guides for that motherboard as everyone runs different options in different places for their BIOS.DDR4-3200 @ cl 16, or 3600 @ cl 18, will have identical latency, effectively ~10ns. In both cases you will get the same latency and the same performance? level 2. Von ingush_zaur im Forum Mainboards und Arbeitsspeicher Antworten: 23 Letzter Beitrag: 12.06.2020, 21:49. Although in theory the higher the frequency the better, actual measurements show there is very little difference between the two you specify.

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. It might cost more money, but latency is just as important and helps make a system snappier.The problem is that at least for the time being, going far past 3200MHz tends to cause motherboard and cpu compatibility to drop precipitously. It can oc upto 3400 CL16 easily. Active on that Overclockers.net and we know disI bet you could get the cl14 kit to run at 3600cl16 too and just benchmark them.3600CL16 is actually worse true latency than 3200CL14.The 3200mhz stick has lower latency (4.375) but lower throughput (3200 MT/s).I recommend the lower latency over the higher throughput.Formula: 1 (nanosecond) / speed (in cycles per nanosecond) * latency (in cycles) = nanosecond latencyStay clear of anything past CL15 unless it is a 4000+ Mhz RAM.In gaming low CL 3200 is better than high CL 3600+.I have Ryzen 1600@4Ghz, GSkill 3600 CL15 RAM and run it at 3466 (14-14-14-26 CR1).3200 CL14, because they have higher quality samsung B dies than 3600 Cl17/Cl18.Wouldn't it be get the samsung B die because it's 3200 CL14 which is superior to lower quality dies that can only do 3600 CL17/18?The consensus on this thread and elsewhere is that 3200 with tighter timings gives better memory performance that increasing speed at the cost of looser timings.There are 2 situations where I'd take the higher speed and looser timings though:If I was doing work that was heavily dependent on inter-core latency - though the returns are diminishing past 3200, they're still there.

Or even if you can get it to run at its rated speed, board behavior would cause it to pump a ton of voltage into the IMC and cause that portion of the CPU to degrade pretty fast.Unless they're doing work that is very memory bandwidth sensitive for a significant enough portion of their day with the system, I would be more focused in trying to get as snappy a kit as possible (as in, low latency) at or above 3200MHz than focusing on just the clock alone. Guru3D.com said these CPUs should be able to do up … Or still one of them is … It can oc upto 3400 CL16 easily.

It tends to be more brand related as well. 3600CL16 would be even slightly better than that, but not worth the price difference.CL18 ones compromise too much on the latency. Suchen Sie sich einfach das Forum aus, das Sie …

Klicken Sie oben auf 'Registrieren', um den Registrierungsprozess zu starten. It can make a up to a 10% difference in fps on some games. Active on that Overclockers.net and we know dis. So it's unlikely we'll see it anytime soon.This is what I use to figure out what memory works better: MT/s over CL, creates a performance ratio. 9900k 1.39v 5.2 83C 185w 1.24v 4.9 60C 135w 1.05v 4.5 90w 50C (doing some testing for hot days) all-2avx cinebench/blender temps.